Henk Tammes Photography
  • Home
  • Portfolio
    • Countries >
      • Algeria
      • Belgium
      • Norway
      • Portugal
    • Landscapes
    • Portraits >
      • Black & White
      • Colour
    • Sports >
      • Athletics
      • BMX
      • Boxing
      • Motorsports
    • All the rest >
      • Jewish cemetary
      • Milkpowder factory
  • Hardware
    • Minolta >
      • Manual Focus >
        • Minolta SR-7
        • Minolta XM
        • Minolta srT303b
        • Minolta XE-1
        • Minolta XG 9
        • Minolta XD 7
        • Minolta X-700
        • Minolta X-500
      • Autofocus >
        • Minolta 7000
        • Minolta 9000
        • Minolta Dynax 7000i
        • Minolta Dynax 8000i
        • Minolta Dynax 7xi
        • Minolta Dynax 9xi
        • Minolta Dynax 600si
        • Minolta Dynax 700si
        • Minolta Dynax 800si
        • Minolta Dynax 7
        • Minolta Dynax 9
      • Vectis APS system >
        • Minolta Vectis S1
        • Minolta Vectis S100
        • Minolta Vectis lenses
        • Minolta Vectis accessories
      • Digital >
        • Minolta RD 3000
        • Konica Minolta Dimage A2
        • Konica Minolta Dynax 7D
  • Blog
  • About me
  • Contact

Minolta and APS.

In 1996 the Advanced Photo System (APS), or Amateur Photo System as Ken Rockwell describes, was introduced. APS was a new fimformat about 56% of normal 135 film. Though heavily pushed by the industry and photographic magazines it never became really succesful. In the 'point-and-shoot' league, normal 135 filmcameras where hardly bigger, mostly cheaper and quite easy to handle too. So where was the advantage of APS?
In the advanced amateur market, Nikon, Canon and Minolta all introduced two APS SLR's. Minolta introduced the S-1 and the simpler S-100. They could never really compete with their 'fullframe' siblings, because imagequality was not good enough. In spite of several photographic magazines which earnestly wrote there was no visible difference. Nonsense! APS can't match with 135 film. Especially if one chooses the P(panorama) size, the shortcomings of APS are clearly visible. The tiny negative is stretched to its limits.
But if you limit the size of your pictures, the Minolta APS SLR's described here are decent little performers. Practical use is none to zero, because APS fim is very hard to get.
By 2004 APS was all over. Digital cameras became better and better and blew away APS.
One thing you should now about APS film is that 3 formats could be chosen. Influencing the cropfactor:
  • H for "High Definition" (30.2 × 16.7 mm; aspect ratio 16:9; crop 1.25)
  • C for "Classic" (25.1 × 16.7 mm; aspect ratio 3:2; crop 1.44)
  • P for "Panoramic" (30.2 × 9.5 mm; aspect ratio 3:1; crop 1.37)
The "C" and "P" formats are formed by cropping. The full image is recorded on the film, and an image recorded in one aspect ratio can be reprinted in another.The cropfactor should be kept in mind when one compares Vectis lenses to 35 mm lenses.
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.